tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66077564131709006932024-03-14T03:22:18.982-07:00How Consciousness Creates Reality - From Perception to Free WillOur striving for knowledge is a declaration of love. By gaining wisdom we are loved in return. The most basic structure of consciousness and reality deciphered and a real solution to the problem of free will.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-41947280747022947062022-12-30T05:40:00.000-08:002024-03-08T22:43:57.259-08:00Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will<div style="text-align: left;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://free-will.de/ac_frontcover.jpg" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="Zoom" border="0" data-original-height="507" data-original-width="326" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVHz9CeECQXlNtWoZGKQe6MYZNMEHMF_W-MnPe1vq3fZ1ZzMAznpO7iGMz9jq6Sy2BjMjs6iEeApizGpdqxhDlmjXQm5DiY8rtoTTeojHIOQJB65WuLnT11R63AYSCSHONU7V-Ukfa4HV1/w129-h200/AC-Cover.PNG" title="Zoom" width="129" /></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Claus Janew</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">Can we trace back consciousness, reality, awareness, and free will to a single basic structure without giving up any of them? This dialogue founds consciousness and freedom of choice on the basis of a new reality concept that also includes the infinite as far as we understand it. Just the simplest distinction contains consciousness. It is not static, but a constant alternation of perspectives. From its entirety and movement, however, there arises a freedom of choice being more than reinterpreted necessity and unpredictability. The unity and openness of the infinite enables the individual to be creative while this creativity directly and indirectly enters into all other individuals without impeding them.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div style="text-align: start;">
<i>Great Read. Thank you for putting your work out into a conscious space
for all. Much appreciated. </i>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">Marcel P. Londt, PhD, South Africa</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<br />
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span><span><a href="https://books.google.de/books?id=BsPNAwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover" style="font-size: x-large; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">Read online</a> (90%) </span><br /><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Alternating-Consciousness-Perception-Infinities-Back/dp/149427180X" style="font-size: x-large; font-weight: bold;">Order the Book</a><span style="font-size: x-large; font-weight: bold;"> </span></span>
</span>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><b>Also in this book:</b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>The Reality of Free Will</b></span>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The uniqueness of each standpoint, each point of effect, can only be "overcome" by the standpoint changing to other standpoints and returning. In such alternation, which can also appear as constant change, lies the unity of the world. The wholeness of an alternation, however, is a structure of consciousness due to the special relationship between the circumscribing periphery and the infinitesimal center. This process structure unites determinacy and indeterminacy also totally in every place. Therefore, everywhere we are dealing with forms of consciousness with more or less freedom of choice and an increasingly unknown depth. We live in a world of choosing consciousness, or rather awareness. In this respect, our environment expresses a deep truth about ourselves.
</div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<i>I am impressed by the comprehensiveness of your interdisciplinary
approach. There are some major philosophical concepts which you weave
very well into a necessary system of reality: potential, the one and the
many, alternation, constant change, the reality and uniqueness of
oneiric experience and the whole, interdependence, infinity, the mandate
of opposites and many more. The combination of these ideas cannot be
attributed solely to any other of the established classical and modern
thinkers of whom I am aware. I thank you for your enlightenment.</i>
</div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">E W Ralph, UK</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span><a name='more'></a></span>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<i>Your important book entitled 'Alternating Consciousness' is very
significative for our project involving creativity and social innovation
research.</i><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Professor Flàvio Filho, Brasil
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div>
<div>
<i>A must read for those who want enlightenment on consciousness.</i>
</div>
<div>Ejiro Imuere, Nigeria</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div><i>Great publication. Really contributed to my knowledge.</i></div>
<div>A. Kumar, India</div>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
(Reader comments apply to the main part <b>Alternating Consciousness</b>.)
</div>
<div><br /></div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;">
My explanation for why no one has yet proposed an i-structure (infinitesimality structure) is that this basically simple concept of reality presupposes a combination of four seemingly very different perspectives. Known approaches combine at most two of them, but largely ignore the others. However, if all four are considered equally, elementary philosophical problems such as those of free will, the particularity of consciousness ('qualia'), and the relation to the other (intersubjectivity) almost solve themselves.
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgs2bu75aXxu1L5fD5ByDi8nKQRSr-0sNbsDcdaGD35BisVPmjZREQRL1G8fk3mVmgO3kSbTwMnITFb1SSpovXbetOXZ3NimFnRJVFJJUEIsJi5srvzU88847z_A5lW_Y04e1AQNVxSrjPIe40mb6-pKk8SfsXkjMw3gzANRoDN3mQfVlpqku83vbgUeQ/s594/Requirements.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="594" data-original-width="594" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgs2bu75aXxu1L5fD5ByDi8nKQRSr-0sNbsDcdaGD35BisVPmjZREQRL1G8fk3mVmgO3kSbTwMnITFb1SSpovXbetOXZ3NimFnRJVFJJUEIsJi5srvzU88847z_A5lW_Y04e1AQNVxSrjPIe40mb6-pKk8SfsXkjMw3gzANRoDN3mQfVlpqku83vbgUeQ/s320/Requirements.jpg" width="320" /></a>
</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;"></div>
<div></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-60669848046249375452022-11-30T04:57:00.000-08:002024-03-12T04:59:55.932-07:00Truthfulness. The Consciousness that Creates Reality<div style="text-align: justify;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://free-will.de/Cover-Truthfulness.png" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="Zoom" border="0" data-original-height="667" data-original-width="438" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLodq_2vCgG9NaS755iBZi-iiROic04ix85kYH9BpaTLw0I9qS-IT8JnR6rb5i49OGaN-YPrJsp3eTqw_kkcxWBfBVKt9GFSUkhccUafWAaTfVFbXEU10cSwFgZ8nIjyIJ7mRMlYAJVeQYtFHeaqG1dFbrM9mf-nhr7watPT7NVl77MfrKXiIWHDlu5dkj/w131-h200/Cover-Truthfulness.png" title="Zoom" width="131" /></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: x-small;">Claus Janew</span>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<b><span style="font-size: medium;">New!</span></b>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Are you tired of feel-good attitudes and really want to solve your problems?
This unusual combination of down-to-earth life practice and magic-like
creativity focuses on authenticity and seriousness as you learn about love,
trust, and higher harmony. The one to two page chapters offer helpful
philosophical, psychological and spiritual insights and do not exclude
"radical" approaches. In particular, the daily life of truthfulness is linked
to the possibility of consciously creating a better reality.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div>
<i>"This book is like a box of good tools. You can put it in a corner and
take it out when you need it, but its true value is only revealed when you
use the tool. Then you will learn to realize unimaginable abilities and
creativity in your life and become a 'real person.'"</i>
</div>
<div>Kurt Folwill, Oldenburg, Germany</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<i>"The book 'Truthfulness' replaces the psychologist, is even better, at
least for me! No waiting time, quick to hand (practical format), no matter
when or where: short, effective advice and tips for any life circumstance
(fear, disappointment, blockages, finding your true self, etc.) to restore
your mental well-being. Those who want to know more about the why will
also find answers. As you delve deeper into the book, you can easily
immerse yourself in the author's interesting philosophy, written in an
easy-to-understand way."</i>
</div>
<div>Ulrike M., Leipzig, Germany</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://books.google.de/books?id=09D5EAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=de#v=onepage&q&f=false" target="_blank">Read sample</a></span></b>
</div>
<div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CXHSXWLS">Order the Book</a></span></b>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<span><a name='more'></a></span>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US"><b>Table of contents</b><o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Foreword: Where from, where to and before you start
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">The Secret, happiness, right away<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">What is truth?<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Telling the truth<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">How can we trust?<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Mistrust in the relationship<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Real feelings, false facts?<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Good illusions and mediocre roles<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Keep quiet or lie to your partner?<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Honesty and passion<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Loosen stubborn patterns of behavior<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Criteria of integrity<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Forgiveness – is that necessary?<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Falling in and out of love<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Love deep and wide<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Fidelity and jealousy – a problem?<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Freedom in the partnership<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Unconditional love?<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Code of trust for close relationships<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Avoid the pain of disappointment<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">What good is a failed attempt?<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">The value of disappointing experiences<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Disillusionment with ideals<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">Optimism deeply realistic<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US">What you really want<o:p></o:p></span>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">Belief work<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Dream thinking<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Self-responsibility and self-liberation<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
The silver bullet<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Goal-orientation<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">Why entreat?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
From the land of milk and honey<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Reality creation 10 percent plus<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Creation: Basic program<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Follow the intention<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
The pure heart<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Creation: Combined program<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
The 100 percent<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Realizing the essence<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Blockages and the like<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">Against fear<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Anxiety acute: insights and tips<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Pricking energy balloons<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Putting yourself in someone's shoes<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Judging people<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Wealth and envy<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Creation: Master program<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Does happiness make sense?<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
Higher harmony – fulfilling suffering?<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">Primal trust<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
The self, emptiness, and awareness<o:p></o:p>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><br /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
(Reader comments apply to the <a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2015/07/wahrhaftigkeit-mit-welchem-bewusstsein.html" target="_blank">German edition</a>. They have been translated from German using DeepL.)
</p>
</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div>
<br />
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-26774726450849737652022-10-29T02:57:00.000-07:002024-03-08T07:34:33.323-08:00How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version<p></p>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">
<span style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><a href="https://free-will.de/CoverFullVersion.PNG"><img alt="Zoom" border="0" data-original-height="578" data-original-width="390" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVoKFnbKZokaSbX69wCfiWyUxe6ATNLYasthBMR3wCUs6Tyx2Ewr94v4IATxRb1l_E6EvEWnKodST85YhbTP-rLiqAh9h5JqRk3Q3wX47LcL4iZXYJ-hXGsPm5eLofOnsO_-SMxDDwYTNGz8cS28zdH60VjtmAASrBPdpsyDVLaoJ8ofyn8Tw0rKsNwg/w135-h200/CoverFullVersion.PNG" title="Zoom" width="135" /></a></span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Claus Janew</span>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The main argument in this book is the undeniable openness of every
system to the unknown. And the fundamental question goes: What does
this openness produce?
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We are a part of the infinite universe and an incorporation of its
wholeness. Both for us means an individualized reality, through which
the universe expresses itself and on the other hand through which it
is built up with. It also means our necessity, importance and
indestructibility for the sum of its incorporations. Most connections
among ourselves are hardly conscious for us. Meanwhile the
infinitesimality structure of all consciousness guarantees not only
the logical lack of inconsistency of these connections but also the
freedom of choice of every individual.<br />Our goal by no means can
be to decide completely consciously. Responsibility contains
spontaneity or rather trust in a meaningful working together of the
forces. We increasingly become aware of our role in the entire
relationship and we learn to contribute optimally to the value
fulfillment of all individuals, ourselves included. Beyond the
supposed differences between objective and subjective reality, we at
some point of awareness comprehend that we create our reality out of
our innermost depths.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div>
<i>"A fabulously good work. Arguments and expositions are coherent.
Fascinating!" </i>
</div>
<div>Karin Kuretschka, Germany</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><a href="https://books.google.de/books?id=PfF5EAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover" style="font-weight: bold;" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Read online</span></a><span><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span>(90%)</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span></span>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><a href="https://www.amazon.com/How-Consciousness-Creates-Reality-Version/dp/B0B54T1DJP/"><b>Order the Book</b></a></span>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<b>Why do we exist? Do we actually create reality? What is the
root of our being? What freedoms do we have? What connects
us <i>intelligently </i>with each other? What is time? What
exactly is immortal about us? If you are tired of tradition
cult and superficiality, if deep thinking brings you
fulfillment and if you also expect practical insights from
philosophy, then read "How Consciousness Creates Reality.
The Full Version" now.</b>
</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;"><br /></div>
</div>
<div>
<i>"Claus Janew's undertaking to put down on paper mental
processes and procedures that we cannot always analyze,
recognize, or follow with our external senses, and especially
the depth with which he treats the subject, is simply
admirable." </i>
</div>
<div>Ingomar Doering, United States</div>
</div>
<div>
<i><br /></i>
</div>
<div>
<i>"In today's world, which is characterized by the levelling of
all values and the selling off of standpoints, the honesty of
Claus Janew's thinking is pleasantly striking." </i>
</div>
<div>Dr Wolfgang Dahlberg, Germany</div>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<span><a name='more'></a></span>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<i>"A well-reasoned way to push science beyond its limits without
falling into pure esotericism. A very thoughtful book, a genuine
attempt to re-examine our fabric of reality carefully and
without bias." </i>
</div>
<div>Prof Dr Wilhelm Schmid, Germany</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<i>"Masterfully written inspiration that has caused me to see the
world with different eyes and will surely inspire me to be more
aware of my own reality for a long time to come. This is a
comprehensive, unusual and skillful exposition of philosophy and
esotericism that offers entirely new explanations and food for
thought." </i>
</div>
<div>Sidony, Germany</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<i>"I am still inspired by your way of expressing yourself...
Thank you for your tireless efforts to make people aware of
their true potential for consciousness." </i>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>N.F., Austria</div>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<i>"It is amazing how just trying to intellectually understand
these connections can expand consciousness." </i>
</div>
<div>F. K., Germany</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<i>"Again and again I open it, reread passages, chapters, and
follow your thoughts, smile, thank you inwardly that you wrote
it, spent years finding words and ways for it, and realize in
everything the perfect solution..." </i>
</div>
<div>C. I. M., Germany</div>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
(Reader comments apply to the
<a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2020/10/die-erschaffung-der-realitat.html" target="_blank">German edition</a>. They have been translated from German using DeepL.)
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-10540644674995927802022-09-28T02:00:00.000-07:002024-03-06T04:59:17.918-08:00How Consciousness Creates Reality<div style="text-align: left;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://free-will.de/frontcover.jpg" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="Zoom" border="0" data-original-height="629" data-original-width="406" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNv2ikRdHudeux72eSWPTu1lI5PXOQ7NA8C3I5mfOCc9z8VMKgY4CrUOAQU1LWaGsMxSR-Pvnod4A68C1WEjxPk_N-Y9szjcxd-O8ob7YvzoXYWL7dgI-1pnjld9yCP18yKh-Pjm_-F_9-/w129-h200/frontcover.jpg" title="Zoom" width="129" /></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><a>Claus Janew</a></span>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The present text is a very abridged version of a book I wrote out of the
desire to examine the structure of our reality from a standpoint unbiased by
established teachings, be they academic-scientific, popular-esoteric, or
religious in nature. We will begin with seemingly simple interactions in our
daily lives, examine how they originate on a deeper level, come to understand
the essentials of consciousness, and finally recognize that we create our
reality in its entirety. In the course of this quest, we will uncover
little-heeded paths to accessing our subconscious, other individuals, and that
which can be understood by the term "God". And the solution to the classical
problem of free will constitutes the gist of the concepts thus revealed.
</div>
<br />
<i>There is no book that explains consciousness in such a clear way as it is
given in this book.</i><br />
Rajagopalan Madasami, India<br />
<br />
<div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><span><a href="https://books.google.de/books?id=9tN0npRAvloC&printsec=frontcover" target="_blank">Read online</a> </span><br /><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Consciousness-Creates-Reality-Claus-Janew/dp/1448669545/">Order the Book</a><span> </span></span></b>
<div>
<br />
<br />
<b>Also in this book:</b><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Omnipresent Consciousness and Free Will</b></span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="node-description overflow editable editable-pre-wrapped editable-click" data-type="textarea" id="nodeDescriptionEditable">This is not an attempt to explain consciousness in terms basically of
quantum physics or neuro-biology. Instead I should like to place the
term "Consciousness" on a broader footing. I shall therefore proceed
from everyday reality, precisely where we experience ourselves as
conscious beings. I shall use the term in such a general way as to
resolve the question whether only a human being enjoys consciousness, or
even a thermostat. Whilst the difference is considerable, it is not
fundamental. Every effect exists in the perception of a consciousness. I
elaborate on its freedom of choice (leading to free will), in my view
the most important source of creativity, in a similarly general way. The
problems associated with a really conscious decision do not disappear by
mixing determination with a touch of coincidence. Both must enter into a
higher unity. In so doing it will emerge that a certain degree of
freedom of choice (or free will) is just as omnipresent as consciousness
- an inherent part of reality itself. </span><br />
<br />
</div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Dynamic Existence</b></span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>What is real? What is creation?</b><br />
Everything is in motion. "Inertness" arises from (approximative)
repetition, that is, through rotation or an alternation that delineates a
focus of consciousness. This focus of consciousness, in turn, must also
move/alternate (the two differ only in continuity). If its alternation
seems to go too far - physically, psychically or intellectually - it
reaches into the subconscious. In this way, interconnection is established
by the alternation of the focus of consciousness. Therefore, in a world in
which everything is interconnected, all focuses must reciprocally
transition into each other. "Reality" is a common "goal", a focus which
all participants can switch into and which is conscious to them as such,
as a potential one. Its "degree of reality" is the probability of its
fully becoming conscious (or more simply: its current degree of
consciousness). Thus, a reality is created when all participants increase
its probability or, respectively, their consciousness of it.
</div>
<br />
<a name='more'></a><span style="text-align: justify;"><br /></span>
<span style="text-align: justify;">Rajagopalan Madasami's complete review:</span><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Three years before I really struggled to find out how the universe
could be experienced as individual. I have studied lots of books
regarding consciousness and law of attraction. All books explained an
abstract view that we have conscious, subconscious, higher self, and
that this higher self has a connection with the universal mind. But
nowhere I had found a clear explanation about what subconscious is, what
higher self is and what universal mind is.
</i>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>A</i><i>fter reading this book, I came to know a clear idea about what all
these minds are. There is no way a person can have this knowledge unless
he has been inspired by God. So very sure this author got all this
information from God's inspiration. Lots of sages, Rishi in our world,
explain God, but no one gives a clear idea how he creates and directs
the reality as it is given in this book. Scientist and those who only
concentrate upon meditation should read this book to realize the truth.
More than that, I just wonder about when he explains the speed of each
mind, alternation and universe concepts. We are all thinking that
conscious, subconscious, super conscious minds are different. But the
truth is there is only one consciousness. This consciousness alternates
(changes the viewpoint) at infinite speed. This infinite speed consists
of all other speeds as sub-frequencies. Each and every speed creates its
own awareness by which we are separated in conscious, subconscious,
super conscious. In the lowest speed we realize ourselves as human. I
came to know this wonderful knowledge through this book. I thank God to
bring this knowledge through the author Mr. Claus Janew. All people
should have this knowledge to create their wonderful life from deep
within. There is no book that explains consciousness in such a clear way
as it is given in this book.</i>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-25066003778734808052022-09-02T04:57:00.005-07:002024-02-17T04:34:06.179-08:00The core<div class="c-cms-output"><div class="MsoNormal"><div style="text-align: justify;">As the core of my philosophy, the well-known unity of opposites can be considered, but applied in a new way and with the greatest possible consistency.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">However, it does not seem very helpful to conclude from this point, because every "application" must be (and was) independently justified to prove its validity. Thus, the unity of opposites is itself more of a result and only thereby becomes a "starting point". At least it offers a connection to the philosophical tradition (Hermes Trismegistus, Yin/Yang, Heraclitus, Cusanus, Hegel).<span></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Philosophically versed readers can also try to transition from Alfred North Whitehead, Edmund Husserl, Ernst Cassirer or Structuralism by thinking their basic theses more consistently and synthetically. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">A tip for mystics: If you compress the seven hermetic principles into one, you get my <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2012/04/definition-of-infinitesimality.html">infinitesimality structure</a> and thus free will. -Satori</div></div><div class="MsoNormal"><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgF_JvCRCBVGMWU4tTwZQqvLnOhcpdYdE6g-eWs4RmigRbeZaEZmyOxZvyT0AKd4ucO0WXNwfJYGUxpZwsX8LMsL5lAeTlYbUCyHo2CnnP2gIcWBkfFhbcuGUJBovAZcTN8NbhWhLE92T7A/s1600/symbol.PNG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="111" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgF_JvCRCBVGMWU4tTwZQqvLnOhcpdYdE6g-eWs4RmigRbeZaEZmyOxZvyT0AKd4ucO0WXNwfJYGUxpZwsX8LMsL5lAeTlYbUCyHo2CnnP2gIcWBkfFhbcuGUJBovAZcTN8NbhWhLE92T7A/s400/symbol.PNG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license" style="text-align: left;"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div></div></div><div class="c-cms-output"><br /></div><div class="c-cms-output"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2011/08/der-einzige-kern.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-88097431122212232542022-08-18T11:51:00.012-07:002024-01-02T05:13:27.213-08:00Nonarguments<div>Nonarguments raised by some researchers against my book <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html">How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version</a> or its <a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2020/10/die-erschaffung-der-realitat.html">German original</a>, and my responses to them:</div><div><br /></div>1. "It is not written in a modern 'scientific' format." <br /><br />Correct. It is written in a free style, as in the time when great discoveries were made in philosophy.<div> <span><a name='more'></a></span><br /> 2. "No references are given." <br /><br />Partially correct. All quotations are referenced. The book was originally intended for a general readership. Part I covers mostly well-known ground, so there are almost no references to the many sources I had studied before starting "from scratch". The content of Parts II–IV was developed from scratch, though inspired by the sources identified in the book. I do not cite what I have not used for good reasons, and I would not cite "sources" just to cover everything that has been written in that context. The main ideas are described for the first time as far as I know.</div><div> <br /> 3. "You did not build on the tradition of philosophy." <br /><br />Almost right. Originally, I did not work for a readership, but to satisfy my own curiosity. I read what interested me, but over time I discovered that I could solve my philosophical problems much more quickly and consistently on my own than by looking for partial answers in the work of others or by correcting existing concepts. I simply asked from a different point of view. So few sources remained. It may be, however, that I have sometimes reinvented older results from a different angle. This is not a paradox, but the creative way.</div><div> <br /> 4. "There is no discussion of other viewpoints." <br /><br />Almost right. I have considered as many counter-arguments as possible before formulating an idea or argument. Much more is not offered because I did not have the time for this mammoth task, which I believe would not have contributed equally to the core of the book. So, unfortunately, the work of comparing arguments in detail is left to the interested reader.</div><div> <br /> 5. "This is old stuff." "Your theory is not connectable." <br /><br />Sounds like a contradiction? It is. If one says this and one says that, the truth is probably somewhere in between, say a different view with new key components.</div><div> <br /> 6. "He is not an academic." <br /><br />True. Now I am proud of it. I have never had to submit to the zeitgeist, and I have never been beholden to the wishes of funders in the field I love.</div><div> <br /> 7. "I don't like this esoteric approach." <br /><br />No problem. Just keep moving.</div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html">How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version</a><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version" border="0" data-original-height="204" data-original-width="138" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggc1CQcePFpeGUG8Nxwa703lxEyqr7UQ4_b9qeLLq_IVHq2O5jQefOvqCB8RflRyxn00VB3Sve9hclZJSggsyo1jZ74QaXPqjqtn0isOXQ406dxNSXQxCYIvHxpzbDeoPlLb8DaGvaTqUR-8bxUIp6IbnB-WuHLFwlozjD6T5VXaLp80Y5ffAq6Sw68A/s16000/CoverFullVersion-m.png" title="How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><br /></div></div><br /><div><br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-57858276129057218792022-08-01T06:15:00.000-07:002024-03-08T00:49:53.039-08:00The Self, Emptiness, and Awareness<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">In this exploration of self-identity, I argue that the self is not a standalone entity but an integral part of a broader consciousness. Deep meditation reveals the self as a construct beyond egoistic confines, interlinked with the external world and others' experiences. Decisions arise from an awareness that transcends individual ego, suggesting that our sense of self is an inexhaustible center of dynamic consciousness rather than an ultimate emptiness.</span></div><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"></span></p><a name='more'></a><p></p><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Who are we? Where are we going? <i>Why</i> are we going there? These kinds of questions have been with us for thousands of years. And somehow they all seem to be related to what we call the self: the feeling of being a specific, distinctive individual. Whether I am doing something for myself or for someone else, <i>with</i> others or alone, it is always <i>me</i> who is acting or acquiescing.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">But opinions differ as to who or what this "I" actually is. We can see our face in the mirror, but not the original. We can think about our mind, but not about the one who thinks. We may be able to switch between the observer and the observed, but obviously we can never grasp the whole. This difficulty, the so-called infinite regress of the observer, has led some philosophers to abandon the constant back and forth and to claim that we are simply who we are. Period. They speak, for example, of the self as a "blind spot" in consciousness, the point that cannot become aware of itself and yet is always present no matter what point of observation we take.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">In fact, in deep meditation we can experience a fundamental identity, the sensation of which is independent of any external perception and remains intact even after meditation. Its most popular interpretation is that we do not have a self at all, but that everything we think we have is just a construction of our restless mind. If we <i>existed</i> independently of all perceptible structures, we could not "possess" a <i>distinguishable</i> identity. Have we found the philosopher's stone?</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">It is certainly true, for example, that we make decisions without reflecting each time on whether the realization of this or that possibility would be good <i>for us</i>. We act out of a free awareness of the whole situation, which includes our more or less authentic sense of identity. This situation includes subconscious impulses and conscious ideals, as well as mutually exclusive alternatives, activities from other sources, and... But wait! According to the above interpretation, <i>others</i>, i.e. differences, should basically not exist, at best illusions of differences. But then why do we <i>decide</i> at all? Why don't we sit down and freeze? Or evaporate into emptiness? Does the illusion have a meaning?</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">We experience a world of physical and mental figures that behave quite idiosyncratically. The individual also constantly chooses different situations, thus changing the <i>individual experience</i> to a certain extent, but within the framework of this change he believes to remain a constant. He experiences a <i>center</i>. But this center is at least interwoven with the differences of the world, reflects them and is reflected in them. In this way it experiences "itself" or a <i>concrete</i> self - and all the more richly, the more (mirror) images it appears in. A core emerges from the unconscious, which is circumscribed by an increasing number of conscious focuses. A self <i>without</i> this would actually be nothing...</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Please note that we have not yet moved beyond the immediate relationship between self and environment. We are still embedded in individual experience. Rather, the self <i>condenses</i> within a mutable whole.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2z__OYkJvrsE6aMIpzcMFL1uadD1MmM2CSuc_M751AuBelcn4db7npKxiKIqLuJM2-pNXkFp6-6qaJEWcQddGD0sxIq2FuuddkBtIR-bDxMK8KPNXVjCx099t4NbElI5nisPIygIRn6_pu47_sDVVkmA1LG-ni_IM60tdx3ZrF9GDJyQRiiITuA2Bt95L/s1024/The-Self-Zusammenfassung.png" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1024" data-original-width="1024" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2z__OYkJvrsE6aMIpzcMFL1uadD1MmM2CSuc_M751AuBelcn4db7npKxiKIqLuJM2-pNXkFp6-6qaJEWcQddGD0sxIq2FuuddkBtIR-bDxMK8KPNXVjCx099t4NbElI5nisPIygIRn6_pu47_sDVVkmA1LG-ni_IM60tdx3ZrF9GDJyQRiiITuA2Bt95L/s320/The-Self-Zusammenfassung.png" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: #ede8e8; color: #222222; font-size: 12px; text-align: start;">Created by AI based on a quote from this text</span></td></tr></tbody></table><br /><div style="text-align: justify;">Going one step further, the self can observe itself from different points of view. It is only now that classical self-consciousness, reflective self-observation, develops.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Strictly speaking, however, I summarize the focuses of consciousness I have passed through as a dynamic diversity, as <i>individuals</i>, in the form of an awareness of different centers of experience <i>culminating</i> in my present one. I therefore perceive a hierarchy of attitudes between which I have chosen or can choose (again). I am only self-aware of my individual peak position in it, more of a point reached than an object.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">We can also extend this awareness to "distant" individuals by putting ourselves in their points of view and returning from them; we see through the eyes of our fellow creatures and integrate their view into a new one of our own. Such a perception cannot be primarily ego-oriented, since it is <i>composed</i> of the worlds of experience of others - albeit to an ultimately more diffuse result. What causes harm to others, for example, is directly harmful to one's own sense of well-being. Or to put it another way: We recognize subliminal aspects of ourselves in others.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">We have thus attained an attitude toward reality that frees us from the much-maligned egoism-without in any way denying our individuality. Even though the individual may at some point break out of his previous range of motion, he does not lose himself. He merely recognizes that his individuality has deeper roots than he had assumed. Can such roots lead nowhere? Hardly. Yet it is equally implausible to speculate that they will lead to absolutely solid ground. Like the path on which we learn, the dynamics of the focus of consciousness should continue into the subconscious (not unconscious) interior. There it may coagulate into an object or form an infinitesimal peak - we certainly do not encounter a final bottom. In this respect, the theorists of the ultimate emptiness of the self are right. But emptiness without structured experience and <i>essential</i> awareness is meaningless.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0TK8x4ef2kvyXpdSRIXMLEt_zcEPBCtUlM7-HKAhSdlyIVAXHyQb-y2wRr4mb2sE2-ky5fgOGbcsp9wCspSBiUFNCB01Y3lnNm8q1dT51GmV5u3R2mznjxWHxBT8JhmgbaUi5HCLXMB1USOMcpv_rNDaAmP3C6y-NcuKblAV52b6mStIAgdyutw-k2Oz-/s1024/The-Self-Abstrakt.png" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1024" data-original-width="1024" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0TK8x4ef2kvyXpdSRIXMLEt_zcEPBCtUlM7-HKAhSdlyIVAXHyQb-y2wRr4mb2sE2-ky5fgOGbcsp9wCspSBiUFNCB01Y3lnNm8q1dT51GmV5u3R2mznjxWHxBT8JhmgbaUi5HCLXMB1USOMcpv_rNDaAmP3C6y-NcuKblAV52b6mStIAgdyutw-k2Oz-/s320/The-Self-Abstrakt.png" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: #ede8e8; color: #222222; font-size: 12px; text-align: start;">Created by AI based on a quote from this text</span></td></tr></tbody></table><br /><div style="text-align: justify;">Can awareness explain why we pursue certain goals? If we are not necessarily fixated on an objective ego, what drives us? Where do the impulses and ideals we follow come from?</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">As I explained in my book <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html">How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version</a>, they arise from the dynamic interlocking of innumerable attitudes of consciousness that long for an addition to their always one-sided experience that enriches both the totality and each individual. This loving value fulfillment (Jane Roberts) is its own purpose and can certainly include an ego object as a symbol of one's own individuality. It is only when this ego claims dominance that it disproportionately restricts awareness, distorts the original impulses, and sometimes transforms disappointed expectations of love into hatred.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Let us summarize: The self is not necessarily an object, but the perceived center of a series of individual standpoints in which it transcends itself. Accordingly, we choose certain ways to experience ourselves in new ways. However, if these choices are egoistically motivated, we <i>limit</i> our goal and thus ourselves. The individual is not limited by nature and certainly not empty: it is inexhaustible.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><img alt="How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version" border="0" data-original-height="204" data-original-width="138" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggc1CQcePFpeGUG8Nxwa703lxEyqr7UQ4_b9qeLLq_IVHq2O5jQefOvqCB8RflRyxn00VB3Sve9hclZJSggsyo1jZ74QaXPqjqtn0isOXQ406dxNSXQxCYIvHxpzbDeoPlLb8DaGvaTqUR-8bxUIp6IbnB-WuHLFwlozjD6T5VXaLp80Y5ffAq6Sw68A/s16000/CoverFullVersion-m.png" title="How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version" /></a></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license" style="text-align: left;"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><p style="text-align: left;">
</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-11935025433408530682022-01-30T04:44:00.000-08:002024-01-30T04:48:15.054-08:00Creating<p style="text-align: justify;">Creating is an endless game of separating (projecting, that way changing) of inner aspects, so getting a new individuality, which we can rejoin (and re-enjoy) then. One moment later we separate a new form of our infinite inner reality and so on. We integrate all these "objects" in a new manner, while our awareness expands. This awareness also just means going into restricted experiences and coming back to the bigger "picture", that now has become more comprehensive, both consciously and subconsciously.</p><p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-4710974514429740302022-01-30T04:40:00.000-08:002024-01-30T04:47:57.539-08:00Opinions<p style="text-align: justify;">I have been
trying to understand how people come to their opinions. Pure logic and
impartiality are rare - largely independent of intelligence. Emotions
constantly distort thinking in one direction or another. Fear of something in
particular does this. Often subliminally, but you can see it very well if you
pay attention. In discussions, I can sometimes see, as if under a microscope,
how someone fails to think ahead at a particular point, but always turns back
to what is pleasant. And, of course, the appearance of rationality has to be
maintained.<span></span></p><a name='more'></a><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">A good
self-test for impartiality is to be able to put yourself in the shoes of all
the players. This is the way to get to know the widest psychological range.
This includes researching and analyzing circumstances, priorities and
probabilities. Priorities and probabilities are the most important because they
are the most susceptible to emotional distortion. Another part is to maintain a
conscious distance and, from that distance, to constantly check oneself for mistakes,
such as wrong basic assumptions or confusing the levels of the overall event.
In addition: What is the goal? Is it to find the truth - even at the expense of
previous beliefs - or to strengthen the opinion in which you have already
invested a lot?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Gut
feelings alone are very susceptible to manipulation. Even without manipulation,
one is sometimes right and sometimes wrong. If gut feelings are to be used,
then at least they should be used correctly: as unemotionally as possible, from
a depth to which one otherwise pays little attention. That, in turn, leads to
empathy and the illumination of all perspectives and to constant
self-examination. Even with this, no one is error-free, but it should
significantly reduce the error rate.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><o:p> </o:p></span><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-10526176920730173882022-01-28T04:16:00.000-08:002024-03-04T21:56:06.643-08:00What has love to do with creativity?<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 107%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">I</span><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">f love is (re)union with one's own potential, then
creativity is its realization. If creativity follows the urge to realize
oneself, to reflect, expand and harmonize in new ways, then love is the
emotional expression of the underlying meaning.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Where does this sense of creative urge come from?<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Interaction (exchange) with spiritually and mentally
harmonizing beings, <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-reality-funnel-what-is-consciousness-2.html">consciousness</a> focuses and concepts creates a special
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/05/all-that-is-what-is-awareness-ii.html">awareness</a>. It is characterized by a higher rate of vibration
(alternating frequency) and greater involvement of a consciousness close to the
essence: The loved one is always on our mind and is important in a subtle or
intense way.<span></span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a><span style="font-family: inherit;"><o:p></o:p></span><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">The inseparability of this love from everything we do
not only shows our interweaving with greater consciousness.
As this love also reaches out to the aware, its released energy strives <i>to spread to the previously <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/08/subconscious-free-or-not.html">subconscious</a></i>.
That is, love flows directly into creativity, joyfully producing new focuses of
consciousness in which it multiplies its quality. The more significant of these
are stabilized like indelible memories: a home, a child, a work of art, a
research result.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 107%;">When love meets a suitable object, it intensifies. On
the other hand, it attracts such objects. But creativity and love are essentially
about creating and feeling, less about having. And what they create together <i>for others</i>, they <i>do not</i> have. Ultimately, it is a value-fulfilling unfolding
of awareness: the seemingly finite striving for what it <i>really</i> is: the infinite.</span> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">If we consider that all awareness flows into
each other, coalesces into the awareness of each individual, from whose depths
only a part of this gigantic potential unfolds, then love <i>also</i> has a universal character. The love of <i>All</i> That Is must be <i>equally</i> turned toward each <i>infinite</i>
awareness as a momentary form of itself.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 107%;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Since my consciousness is <i>now</i> at the top of my individual hierarchy of all perspectives, this
love has <i>priority</i>. It even applies
exclusively to my entire indivisible hierarchy of perspectives at that moment.
Yet, at the same moment, it is already turned toward another awareness. <o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">We humans are slower to respond: our deepest feelings
are for a particular partner at a particular time. But in other phases of our
movement of consciousness, our love is for other people and things. The
intensity of our feelings varies according to our inner preferences.
All-encompassing love must also differentiate between phases (focuses) of
consciousness, but its intensity can only fluctuate <i>from the perspective of that consciousness</i> - another sign of its
diversity. </span></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></p><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:<br /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html">How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version</a><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version" border="0" data-original-height="204" data-original-width="138" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggc1CQcePFpeGUG8Nxwa703lxEyqr7UQ4_b9qeLLq_IVHq2O5jQefOvqCB8RflRyxn00VB3Sve9hclZJSggsyo1jZ74QaXPqjqtn0isOXQ406dxNSXQxCYIvHxpzbDeoPlLb8DaGvaTqUR-8bxUIp6IbnB-WuHLFwlozjD6T5VXaLp80Y5ffAq6Sw68A/s16000/CoverFullVersion-m.png" title="How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version" /></a><div><br /></div></div></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div></div></div><p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license" style="text-align: left;"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-63689928152732629652019-12-18T01:09:00.025-08:002023-03-18T08:58:12.341-07:00Truth, Harmony, and Free Will<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The stem of the <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-reality-funnel-what-is-consciousness-2.html">Reality Funnel</a> summarizes the
alternation of the less conscious points of view "perspectively". But
if they don't just jump around there, they also have a closer effect on each
other and are wound up in places to cores that <i>harmoniously connect many perspectives</i>. (Without harmony, they
would fall apart again.) <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Such a comparatively harmonious core, such as our
inner self, can hold our <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/02/what-is-awareness-i.html">Awareness (I)</a> together, and from it probably emanate <i>more comprehensively harmonizing</i>
impulses for thought and action than from the adjusting roles of our little
ego. On the other hand, this ego can often handle everyday situations better.
Therefore, it is best if each one devotes itself to its <i>own</i> subject and <i>benefits</i>
only from the skills of the other. We can <i>feel</i>
such a harmony like a beautiful concert. If, on the other hand, the ego is
completely in tune with the inner self, we can speak of unity, but hardly of
harmony: The connection is too rigid and the duet probably short.<span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a> <o:p></o:p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">Harmony
can thus be translated as <i>meaningful
correspondence</i> and leads to a correspondingly meaningful definition of
truth: The more unity or harmony there is between a content of consciousness
and the respective more comprehensive level, the truer it is. <o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Mutually retroactive alternations (interactions) thus
lead to a loose hierarchical structure in which truth is standpoint dependent,
but not too much so. The individual truths meet in a center that is much less
mobile within their convoluted awareness. It is only as their awareness expands
that even deeper truths are included, relativizing the previous center on an
even more comprehensive level.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">If we imagine the reality funnel again, inner
inspirations come through the funnel stem, be they impulses, ideals, or
sensations (all focuses of consciousness, since there is only perceived
alternation). On the other hand, the most conscious circumscription occurs at
the edge of the funnel, and the center of the total circumscription lies
exactly on the funnel axis. And this is where it gets exciting: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">As explained in <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/how-is-freedom-of-choice-possible.html">Freedom of Choice</a>, we make decisions
somewhere between the center and the periphery. But the total circumscription
now "disappears" into the funnel stem! It is condensed -
"perspectively" to a stronger convolution - and finally coincides
with the funnel axis. Whether a decision is a free one or whether it is the
result of an inner impulse is, in the end, no longer distinguishable! We can
only become conscious of impulses further up, where we can then also deviate
from them.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Do we have reason to doubt our inspirations? That
depends on whether they come from our deepest essence and whether we are in
harmony with it. For truth, as I have said, is unity or harmony with the more
comprehensive level. However, it is precisely this broader interconnectedness
that distinguishes an essence from each of its appearances. Thus, the deeper
the origin of an inspiration, the more likely and the stronger the involvement
of our most profound being in it, and the more trustable it is. And vice versa,
the more authentically we express our deepest inner self, the more trust worthy
we are ourselves.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">This means even more: If we are not consciously aware
of having chosen certain "conditions" of our life, but they must have
been chosen by our logical conclusions, then it stands to reason that this
choice takes place on a more comprehensive level and is significantly
determined by our innermost essence. In this respect, our environment expresses
a deep truth about ourselves.<br /><o:p></o:p></span></p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><div class="MsoNormal"><span>This text is an excerpt from the book</span><br /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div><div></div></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:<br /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html">How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version</a><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2022/05/how-consciousness-creates-reality-full.html" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version" border="0" data-original-height="204" data-original-width="138" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggc1CQcePFpeGUG8Nxwa703lxEyqr7UQ4_b9qeLLq_IVHq2O5jQefOvqCB8RflRyxn00VB3Sve9hclZJSggsyo1jZ74QaXPqjqtn0isOXQ406dxNSXQxCYIvHxpzbDeoPlLb8DaGvaTqUR-8bxUIp6IbnB-WuHLFwlozjD6T5VXaLp80Y5ffAq6Sw68A/s16000/CoverFullVersion-m.png" title="How Consciousness Creates Reality. The Full Version" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div></div></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2014/07/wahrheit-harmonie-und-freier-wille.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-23188907112518477592019-12-08T01:58:00.021-08:002023-03-18T03:03:01.310-07:00Is There a Constant Reality?<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">If we can exist only in the constant change of the
point of view (sensory, psychic, mental) and this must apply analogously to
every place of effect (hardly has it worked, it is different), how then
stability, something constant arises?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Of course, by <i>repeating</i>
the alternation: of thought, of way of looking at things, of mutual
confirmation, of effect. Quite exactly, the change can be repeated only for an
infinitely short moment; then it must already reach beyond the repetition in
order not to cancel itself out. That is, it changes <i>altogether</i> and thereby remains open. For stabilization, <i>approximate</i> repetition is sufficient,
though. So we believe approximately the same thing for a long time. <span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a><o:p></o:p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Why again do we repeat ourselves <i>at all</i>? Because otherwise everything would disappear again immediately,
existing only for an infinitely short moment. But if something has gained
minimal stability and thus formed an <i>entirety</i>,
this can have a further stabilizing effect, since a change <i>with it as such</i> now also contains more repetition: Each alternation
<i>contains</i> its sides, after all, and
thus "brings" something from each side into the other. If one of them
is relatively constant, the other one is "addressed" again and again
in a similar way and thus "seduced" to constancy. Or it loses the connection
at some point.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">In the so-called "matter" it happens not
differently: It stabilizes itself in this way in molecular interactions thus
forming mountains, table and climate. Since it is nothing but small and big
alternations of the place of effect, the whole alternation can be traced in
principle up to the human brain and its mind - and vice versa from the mind
into its brain into its environment. We find manifold intermediate
stabilizations of emotional-mental, mechanical, electromagnetic, other and
unknown kind, all contributing to our relatively steady world, but never
self-contained.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Now, however, the entirety of an alternation is, as
described, a consciousness structure (see <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/what-is-consciousness-1.html">Consciousness I</a> and <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-reality-funnel-what-is-consciousness-2.html">Consciousness II</a>).
Consequently, we are dealing with forms of consciousness <i>everywhere</i> - with more or less <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/how-is-freedom-of-choice-possible.html">Freedom of Choice</a> (see
there as well as <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/08/subconscious-free-or-not.html">Subconscious</a>) and an increasingly unknown depth (see <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/02/what-is-awareness-i.html">Awareness I</a>
and <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/05/all-that-is-what-is-awareness-ii.html">Awareness II</a>). We live in a world of the choosing consciousness or
awareness. So constancy is <i>willed</i>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">We humans, for example, create legal laws; animals,
plants and bacteria form their own social rules; and the inter-actions of
"matter" also fit into regularities, so-called "laws of
nature." However, from the relative openness of every alternation system follows
equally that it can change at any time with a certain probability. Therefore,
even "laws of nature" must be relative in some way.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Their stability in experimentation is based - like
that of our living world - on relatively closed "collective" interrelationships.
They mean the far-reaching exclusion of alternative paths of alternation and
favor mutual "dependencies." What we believe, we look for and find
with higher probability, and what we mostly find, we believe. We alternate
there again and again, with all others pointing us to it, and suppress the
seemingly inappropriate "rest". Ultimately, what is found and what is
believed are inseparable and possible deviations are aberrant. And we are even
right about that: Our Reality Funnel is established.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Only of what we cannot change <i>despite</i> deliberate openness, we do not yet know <i>why</i> it resists. On the other hand, it
would also be strange if we had unlimited potential with limited knowledge of
the world - or if we understood our deepest intentions. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;">
<div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: justify;">This text is an excerpt from the book</span><br />
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><b><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2014/07/gibt-es-eine-bestaendige-realitaet.html">Original version in German here</a></b></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-6415534584932158152019-10-13T02:44:00.022-07:002023-03-18T00:39:08.983-07:00Probability Thinking<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">When we
weigh between two alternatives, say between job A and job B, we weigh between
their respective <i>priorities</i>. Each job
has a certain probability of realization, which can change during the weighing,
whereupon the probability of the other job immediately adjusts. That is, if we
prefer job B, job A becomes less probable, but remains available in the
background for a while. With job B we choose an individual<i> probability hierarchy as such</i> to our reality. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">What about
the other candidates? They and their choices are also part of our probability
hierarchy. They are aspects <i>of our
individual <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/05/all-that-is-what-is-awareness-ii.html">Awareness</a></i>, which <i>as a
whole</i> decides for a new individual reality, for a new probability
hierarchy. This means in reverse: The other candidates have <i>their own</i> awareness and choose <i>their own</i> probability hierarchies. We
all <i>meet</i> in the respective awareness,
<i>but we do not merge</i>.<span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a> <o:p></o:p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">If we
decide for job B <i>through and through</i>,
the others consequently decide for job A or C <i>in our reality</i>. More or less consciously. The same is true for the
others <i>in their</i> realities. There is
no contradiction, because in each individual reality, from each perspective, it
is a <i>common</i> choice. Even if I get job
B, I can be aware of my alternative realities in job A or C, so that the
individual realities intertwine, interact. Therefore, it may not be easy to
come to terms with oneself thoroughly. But once this is achieved, the
corresponding reality inevitably follows. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">There is
also no perspective in which everyone chooses job B through and through,
because in the application situation the individual preliminary decisions of
all applicants (and many others) for certain working conditions already
converge: Only one can have the job, not all for an hour or all at the same
time. And so a situation in which everyone wants the job B through and through
would contain an internal contradiction that demands a solution <i>from the outset</i>: by <i>different</i> decisions of the applicants. Preferably "in
time", but also shortly before signing the contract. Please observe
yourself in your application situations: I'll bet you basically know in advance
whether you'll get the job - and actually agree (deep down; mostly). As
notorious doubters, we just like to "play hardball" and get confirmed
by the hiring manager. Nevertheless: The final decision of all parties involved
can, if they wish, be made at the last moment. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span lang="EN-US">Oversimplified</span></i><span lang="EN-US"> because it is more vivid, we can perceive all
individuals as "cones" of their probable changes: We are all moving
together like spirits (or ghosts) at a certain distance from each other under a
single fabric of probabilities that adapts to our shapes and movements. The web
shows the "visible" interweaving of our options and choices, and
hints at even more potential that lies beneath it. We need to coordinate our
choices to move one way or the other, at least roughly, with those of all the
other spirits, so that we don't distort the fabric too much or get entangled in
it. The priorities and thus the probability shapes adapt to each other until
they are predominantly <i>in harmony</i>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The
probability of developments as a fifth dimension besides space and time lets us
see not only in black and white, but lets us recognize the manifold
alternatives in the background that surround us like waves. This in turn leads
to a <i>more</i> <i>conscious</i> cooperation with others and an expanded awareness of our
possibilities.<br /><br /></span></p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;">The next
images show Berta's "elective relationships":</span></blockquote>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-YFJbpz9dCLDrO1LQZbEH8hsSegK6bYB720TwqUSYUO_1bCYjHZK8sodfTmC6N865-amcalA2DG7HDy043b06RJuzyNxoin0EU-RxaguKMBNwijcrQ-zMzwTi2fJOjwKRMLCV_Jzv3sMW/s1600/Trichter4-engl.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="694" data-original-width="568" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-YFJbpz9dCLDrO1LQZbEH8hsSegK6bYB720TwqUSYUO_1bCYjHZK8sodfTmC6N865-amcalA2DG7HDy043b06RJuzyNxoin0EU-RxaguKMBNwijcrQ-zMzwTi2fJOjwKRMLCV_Jzv3sMW/s640/Trichter4-engl.jpg" width="521" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<u><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;">Figure 3</span></u><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;">: <span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">As
Berta changes her mind from Job A to Job B, which is a better fit for her, her
perceived alternatives are rearranged in the probability hierarchy</span></span>.</span></blockquote>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg27Dou_NZYscotItn1lnMa8dMt0Z5yJeZgOTeFw9Ik57oTwJ5ppeMrIA3OSeXGtmxuDTKTCFGblmMGln61Klt3v04r3jOLRxqwsH2DHPcFIJs6JvkeapakpimP4PjsxOe9Vz3bzE0SvS5k/s1600/Trichter5.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1565" data-original-width="1053" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg27Dou_NZYscotItn1lnMa8dMt0Z5yJeZgOTeFw9Ik57oTwJ5ppeMrIA3OSeXGtmxuDTKTCFGblmMGln61Klt3v04r3jOLRxqwsH2DHPcFIJs6JvkeapakpimP4PjsxOe9Vz3bzE0SvS5k/s640/Trichter5.jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<u><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;">Figure 4</span></u><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;">: <span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Berta's
awareness is in a joint decision-making and attunement process with that of her
rival Alf. If she prefers job B, he has to choose job A. Both are aware of
their alternative existences in the respective other job and also of their
alternative rival. They form their own as well as a collective probability
hierarchy, which <i>together</i>, from the
conscious to the subconscious, decide on a <i>priority</i>
new overall structure - for example, the one in which Berta has Job B and Alf
has Job A. The alternative overall structure falls just like Berta's
"single" alternatives in Figure 3</span></span>.<o:p></o:p></span></blockquote>
<br /><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;"><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">This text is an excerpt from the book<br />
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:</span><br style="text-align: justify;" /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-consciousness-creates-reality.html" style="text-align: justify;">How Consciousness Creates Reality</a><br style="text-align: justify;" /><br style="text-align: justify;" /><div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-consciousness-creates-reality.html"><img alt="How Consciousness Creates Reality" border="0" data-original-height="252" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicWqC0ajiWb4Jrivz6Tj6Mb_FtYjD7MIhZAl-dDADRDCo8pjJCwWIEHGXZ0qrPS0BHYQHIWvoPPSJecKcDrmMJQUyVZWKwwQehexBsk8Fz_shW2ErguZouqsxsaMnvG4RlAhy-dBr4rNfR/w129-h200/reality-m.jpg" title="How Consciousness Creates Reality" width="129" /></a></div></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2014/06/wahrscheinlichkeitsdenken.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-24491277651068469922019-08-22T10:09:00.022-07:002023-03-18T07:46:27.868-07:00Subconscious - Free or Not?<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">If we combine
the results of <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/what-is-consciousness-1.html">Consciousness I</a> and <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-reality-funnel-what-is-consciousness-2.html">Consciousness II</a> as well as <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/02/what-is-awareness-i.html">Awareness I</a> and <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/05/all-that-is-what-is-awareness-ii.html">Awareness II</a>, the
following picture emerges:</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-indent: -18pt;">We are aware of what exists for us in the
circumscribing alternation of perspectives as their common approximation.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="text-indent: -18pt;">When perspectives slip away from the
approximation, we can still be aware of them. They exist <i>as such</i> in constant alternation.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="text-indent: -18pt;">Everything that exists dynamically (i.e.,
alternately) transitions in a funnel-like manner from the most conscious
"opening" through a perspectively "narrowing" stem into an
awareness that we can call <i>subconscious</i>.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="text-indent: -18pt;">This
subconscious ultimately extends to All That Is.<a name='more'></a></span></li>
</ul>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Subconscious things therefore exist even when we are
not consciously "looking". Because subconsciously we are <i>always</i> looking (again and again). We are
"disappearingly" aware of All That Is. This means that we are
"alternately" connected to it and can also expand this awareness. But
we can also dive down into this awareness with the focus of our consciousness,
widen the funnel stem only in <i>certain</i>
places and return richer - in knowledge, hunches and sensations. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">What are we conscious of <i>there</i>? What do we discover as we dive in? Other worlds, other ways
of connecting, the essence of other people? Yes, and every day - and especially
at night. We can learn to bring back more of these impressions. But even without
that, we discover much of our own essence here.</span></p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="tlid-translation"><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language: EN;">Let's expand our list of insights by one more point, and take into account our <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/how-is-freedom-of-choice-possible.html">Freedom of Choice</a> with the second point:</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="text-indent: -18pt;">Since
consciousness and awareness differ only in the degree of emphasis of the
circumscribed central area, both are a <i>single</i>
i-structure.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="text-indent: -18pt;">An i-structure
<i>chooses</i> its further change – within
the constraints imposed on it by "other" i-structures.</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">We seem to be surrounded by such constraints. Even
what our neighbor decides can affect us, and it is not even possible to talk to
the door frame. But let us remember that all awareness is a hierarchy of
probable realities with the most probable here and now. So when we choose a
different reality funnel, all the probable realities are restructured for us.
However, these realities continue to exist as themselves. Even their respective
top positions exist in awareness, just not here and now for us.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">So we don't have to defeat our neighbor, because in
another reality he has already consented. We just have to <i>choose</i> that reality. (He may well do the same with the reality in
which <i>we</i> have consented.) To do this,
our focuses in other affected areas of life should be in agreement with this
choice. That is, we should harmonize in our awareness the hierarchy of our own
inner choices. Then the neighbor goes where we <i>both</i> want him to go. (Even the version in which we both choose
mirror-invertedly, we are aware of without contradiction, just not here and now
as a priority).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Why is the door frame so solid? It isn't: Take a
sledgehammer and smash it! But I think you <i>want</i>
the frame. You want the earth and the sun. You want conditions. Why <i>these</i> conditions - that would be a
question to the subconscious where we hope to find more of our essence.<br /><br /></span></p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><div class="MsoNormal"><span>This text is an excerpt from the book</span><br /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div><div></div></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:<br /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-consciousness-creates-reality.html">How Consciousness Creates Reality</a><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-consciousness-creates-reality.html"><img alt="How Consciousness Creates Reality" border="0" data-original-height="252" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicWqC0ajiWb4Jrivz6Tj6Mb_FtYjD7MIhZAl-dDADRDCo8pjJCwWIEHGXZ0qrPS0BHYQHIWvoPPSJecKcDrmMJQUyVZWKwwQehexBsk8Fz_shW2ErguZouqsxsaMnvG4RlAhy-dBr4rNfR/w129-h200/reality-m.jpg" title="How Consciousness Creates Reality" width="129" /></a></div></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2014/05/unterbewusstsein-frei-oder-unfrei.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-59755825308675209152019-05-29T04:57:00.020-07:002023-08-05T04:09:41.052-07:00All That Is – What is Awareness? (II)<div style="text-align: justify;"><div><span lang="EN-US">If every perspective is individual and if structures arise
only from circumscribing alternations, then alternation cannot be limited to
the <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/02/what-is-awareness-i.html">Awareness (I)</a> of a human being. Rather, every point of view, every place of
effect must alternate and arise from alternations. (Ultimately, it is the
alternation of infinitely small points of an I-structure - defined in <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/what-is-consciousness-1.html">What is Consciousness? (I)</a>).</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span><span lang="EN-US">This consequence entails others:</span></div><div><ol><li><span lang="EN-US" style="text-indent: -18pt;">We must basically be able to put ourselves into the individual awareness
of other humans (and even non-humans). Indeed, we empathize with others;
otherwise we could not communicate with them. We at least repeatedly <i>approximate</i> their points of view and
thus converse with persons who are <i>similar</i>
to them. If we were to put ourselves <i>completely</i>
in their position, our consciousness would quickly be overwhelmed and would
have to repress most of it into the subconscious.</span></li><li><span lang="EN-US">Changing a point of view is changing the whole reality (a rearrangement
of the Reality Funnel), namely from a foreseen, <i>probable</i> reality to an <i>even
more probable</i> one, the present reality. As one reality takes precedence,
the others fall into their subordinate position. They become or remain
potential, just as the one that now takes precedence was before. But they do
not disappear: They are still aware standpoints <span><a name='more'></a></span><o:p></o:p></span></li></ol></div><div>A standpoint as a place of effect, as a momentary apex
of reality and center of structure-forming changes, goes far beyond what we
normally understand by "consciousness". Such a point can be <i>anywhere</i>, in an ant, in a star, in a
vacuum. It would be meaningless if no alternation culminated in it, no
circumscription determined it. Ultimately, there is only alternation as such -
all-encompassing and therefore indefinitely fast: All That Is.</div></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">When alternation forms a circumscription (ant, star,
space), it begins to <i>prefer</i> this particular
movement to others and to filter it out, as it were. Through interwoven
repetition, the movement <i>appears</i>
slower, although the all-encompassing alternation still goes on. Only now it is
largely hidden (deep in the stem of the reality funnel). </span></p></div>
</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Since circumscribing forms create from the beginning what we have recognized as consciousness (<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/what-is-consciousness-1.html">Consciousness I</a>), we can
also speak of an <i>all-encompassing
consciousness</i>. </span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Since the alternation never stops and only
takes place between more or less conscious standpoints (<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-reality-funnel-what-is-consciousness-2.html">Consciousness II</a>), we recognize
an <i>all-encompassing awareness</i>.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Since consciousness also means <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/how-is-freedom-of-choice-possible.html">Freedom of Choice</a>, we are dealing with a <i>choosing
all-encompassing awareness</i>.</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: justify;"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Some would call it "God" - a God who
"lives" in everything and everyone, since everything is a phase of
His movement. At the same time, "He" is on such an unimaginable path
that His decisions are ultimately "unfathomable". On the other hand,
our decisions are a part of His. This means that what we decide is important.
It creates a different awareness of All That Is, a unique hierarchy of
consciousness, a complete reality. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">And only <i>our</i>
reality follows <i>our</i> path. Even in God
it is new.</span></p></div></span>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">This text is an excerpt from the book<br />
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2014/04/all-das-was-ist-gewahrsein.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US">
</span></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-45635754945925376642019-03-13T11:08:00.018-07:002023-03-17T00:52:32.069-07:00The Reality Funnel - What is Consciousness? (II)<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">In <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/what-is-consciousness-1.html">What is Consciousness? (I)</a> we considered the formation of i-structures through
circumscription, and in <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/02/what-is-awareness-i.html">What is Awareness? (I)</a> the alternation of perspective
as such. But basically both are one and the same.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Circumscribing
movement - consciousness - is of course an alternation of individual points of
view. And the perception of an alternation - awareness - also circumscribes a
constant center. The difference between <i>emphasized</i>
circumscription and <i>emphasized</i> alternation
lies in the density of the circumscribed central area. If the circumscribing
alternation (for example, between facades) forms an object (a house), the
content-dense center symbolizes its unity ("being inside"). If the
alternation is perceived more as such, the object character is thin ("Is
it several houses or one?"). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The maximum
of unity is in the intuitive center point, while the maximum of alternation is
in the alternation itself. That is, the alternation is authoritative and the
circumscription is derived. (Without facades, there is no interior.)<span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a> <o:p></o:p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Now,
however, the "trace" of the alternation (of the facade run) is more
or less wound up in the memory, that is, condensed, and the respective
awareness is only <i>incompletely conscious</i>
of the entire alternation (for example, between three bare walls with corners
and a few windows). The rest (more windows, attic, back wall) leads into the
just not conscious, into a narrowing. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Awareness
includes consciousness of this transition ("closer, behind"). But consciousness
is in a sense the "upper" part of awareness, while awareness as such
also includes the just not conscious "further down" by <i>alternating</i> with it. This is more than a
point transition or a coagulated potential. From the alternation between conscious
and subconscious, awareness "receives," so to speak, impressions and
inklings that escape the more static consciousness ("a chamber
somewhere").<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">All in all,
consciousness resembles a funnel, the rim of which represents the
circumscribing (alternating) movement, which condenses and narrows inward and
merges with the funnel stem into the just not conscious. Only the center point
of the whole movement remains conscious. Awareness, on the contrary, <i>follows</i> the stem to the other side
("to the back, around the corner"), i.e. it changes over there into
the consciousness <i>whose</i> stem leads
back again. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The
difference is not strict: Consciousness is always awareness! Awareness is also
conscious, but it points beyond and always includes <i>more</i> than what is currently conscious. Alternation cannot be
approximately fixed. With consciousness we only try to ignore it, and then its
own changeable nature slips away from us, the awareness from which it
"spirals out". <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The
connection between awareness and consciousness was also pointed out in
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/12/individuality-and-reality.html">Individuality and Reality</a>: Through the alternation of individual perception, a
common <i>approximation</i> is constructed,
a conscious reality (a rolling pen, a house). Since the alternating coiling is
condensed during the formation of the approximation and the alternating
standpoints "disappear" in the funnel stem, we do not overlook the
formation of reality. However, since consciousness <i>always</i> creates approximate commonalities, the consciousness funnel
is a reality funnel. It creates reality <i>out
of</i> the funnel stem by approximating individualities to <i>one</i> consciousness, but <i>at no
point</i> by relinquishing them. Everything remains awareness.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Some
aspects may also become clear from the following figures: </span></span></blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0lrjKKAI8D41oM0ySRBYIXTOwkWQS0PX3bVzvIoMRsku-vyVc8KZf4qgOHDWQJhzYa_IoCtomutFJzYu1iFwDnyFbTBmPOuBZBMg5MFpBbD1s01TAJJy9_B3p8IlRKWFt0zROQIt6S5xN/s1600/Trichter1.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="312" data-original-width="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0lrjKKAI8D41oM0ySRBYIXTOwkWQS0PX3bVzvIoMRsku-vyVc8KZf4qgOHDWQJhzYa_IoCtomutFJzYu1iFwDnyFbTBmPOuBZBMg5MFpBbD1s01TAJJy9_B3p8IlRKWFt0zROQIt6S5xN/s1600/Trichter1.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjW2Fcrxp_2H3BV5yF7aESq6U78kGpc25DbHqcbdc_fE1r2_ql73CFb6WGrrKbP8QMoumD_bwXghovfszEj8m7VuaFuRem6n1-GRHTszysSGHJ7kCIwzSJg-rxa2rNeB4SECSZbJAxVH5bm/s1600/Trichter2.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="293" data-original-width="388" height="241" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjW2Fcrxp_2H3BV5yF7aESq6U78kGpc25DbHqcbdc_fE1r2_ql73CFb6WGrrKbP8QMoumD_bwXghovfszEj8m7VuaFuRem6n1-GRHTszysSGHJ7kCIwzSJg-rxa2rNeB4SECSZbJAxVH5bm/s320/Trichter2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><u><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;">Figure 1</span></u><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;">: </span></span></span><span style="text-align: left;">Above, the
circumscribing condensation in the reality funnel is shown. Below, a possible
top view shows how the alternation of perspective condenses into an apparently
static object consciousness.</span></blockquote><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSQ3-OdCWeMfz59RDOS8GnY3R8iE-_o9KEfyvZJh1RobGFyNkqzvDkTkVqe3vmgHHfod26j2288dpxT9PNowl7VYrfFp4rlkBg_c_NQcHzCAfZmbVMI7yiJgpHSC4Uh4Fhfn6uMj1RaspX/s1600/Trichter3.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="506" data-original-width="394" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSQ3-OdCWeMfz59RDOS8GnY3R8iE-_o9KEfyvZJh1RobGFyNkqzvDkTkVqe3vmgHHfod26j2288dpxT9PNowl7VYrfFp4rlkBg_c_NQcHzCAfZmbVMI7yiJgpHSC4Uh4Fhfn6uMj1RaspX/s320/Trichter3.jpg" width="249" /></a></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><u>Figure 2</u>: <span style="text-align: left;">This
is a summary and further simplification of Figure 1. This time I have
emphasized the overall movement of perspective and the resulting spatial object
awareness.</span></span></blockquote><p> </p><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">This text is an excerpt from the book</span></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;"><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</span></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2014/04/realitaetstrichter-bewusstsein.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-88628430828635286682019-02-12T07:12:00.017-08:002023-03-15T12:07:48.946-07:00What is Awareness? (I)<div class="MsoNormal"><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">The <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/12/individuality-and-reality.html">uniqueness</a> of each standpoint, each point of view,
can obviously only be "overcome" by <i>changing</i> the standpoint to other standpoints. And returning. In
such alternation alone, which can also appear as constant change, lies the
unity of the world.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">The grasping of this dynamic unity goes beyond mere
consciousness, because <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/what-is-consciousness-1.html">Consciousness (I)</a> always tends to circumscribing
condensation, i.e. to the formation of symbolic, quasi-static objects. In
contrast, the change to other points of view - other individual attitudes - is
naturally more open. The perception of this alternation is what I call <i>awareness</i>.<span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a> <o:p></o:p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Awareness is never "fixed. It is always the <i>becoming of something else</i>, more
precisely of many others: It is constantly <i>arising</i>
out of this movement of alternation, and it consists only in this movement. It
is therefore also the perception of <i>potential</i>.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">But <i>whose</i>
potential? No, not ours, if by "ours" we mean a quasi-static
self-image. For such an image would already be largely fixed. Instead, in order
to change, for example, from the individuality of a civil servant to that of an
amateur artist, the civil servant must be "dissolved" and condensed
anew into the artist. It is not the official who has moved, but <i>the alternation</i> between the one and the
other <i>has been wound differently</i>. In
this process, both the civil servant and the artist are aware of their
alternative selves. Moreover, both are aware of the possible points of view on
the way from the office to the studio and back again. And they are also aware
of the possible attitudes in the cinema or the theater. And of the different
positions within the office, the studio, and the home. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">The awareness changes with each attitude, but it
includes all possible attitudes. Sometimes one has priority - it is more real
and less potential - sometimes the other. Sometimes the awareness is more
limited, for example, to the pages of a file, then again more open with a view
into life. But even in the file, the artist occasionally comes into play, and
in the artist, the pedant. And at home, both. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Mentally we alternate faster than psychically or
physically, because psyche and body are more "fixed". The psychic
structure of alternation is more deeply entangled, and the body, too, is the
result of relatively stable alternations ("interactions") that we
hardly overlook. But, <i>strictly speaking</i>,
there is no place where we can say, "Now <i>we</i> have changed position," because "we" consist <i>exclusively</i> of intertwined alternations.
Basically, there is only awareness.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">But who is aware of the alternation of awareness? A
nice trick question.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">In reality, awareness is <i>always</i> an alternation between other awarenesses, between <i>perspectives</i> of the whole alternation.
Awareness, as I said, changes the rank, the <i>hierarchy</i>
of potential attitudes. When the "Official" speaks, the inspiration
is usually silent, and vice versa. What the official is also aware of, however,
is the subordination of his awareness to the awareness of the artist (and so
on). It is with the awareness, then, that the whole nesting of descending
priorities, points of view, and twists and turns alternates.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">So what are we aware of, in short?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"></p><ul><li>All that is unique is contained in all that is unique.</li><li>The alternation of uniqueness is the most natural thing in the world.</li></ul><p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"></span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div>This text is an excerpt from the book</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;"><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2014/02/gewahrsein.html"><b>Orininal version in German here</b></a></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-61864514936139806372019-01-21T02:09:00.015-08:002023-06-21T11:20:37.156-07:00How is Freedom of Choice Possible?<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The question of whether we can freely choose among
several possibilities, without imagining this freedom or confusing it with
chance, leads us to the truth about our responsibility. For if we had to answer
for something that came from us but was not <i>decided</i>
by us, it would be no more than the responsibility of a cloud for its rain. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">To find the answer, let us consider the simple choice
between two continuations of our day, for example, whether to go to the cinema
or to the theater. Actually, we like both equally, although sometimes we feel
more like one than the other. Today, however, we really don't care; we could
just as well flip a coin. But we don't - that would be too cheap. We think. We
put ourselves into the cinema, then into the theater, then back into the
present, and so on. In this way we circumscribe the entirety of the decision situation, the present being its center. Strictly speaking, this center is
infinitely small, right in the middle of the whole circumscription with all its
details. That is, in us.<span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a><o:p></o:p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">In the periphery, in turn, our perception of the
cinema influences the subsequent perception of the theater, and vice versa -
and again, our present, and vice versa. The <i>indeterminacy</i>
between the <i>determined</i> alternatives
thus condenses into the <i>determinacy</i>
of the decision situation right up to its exact center, which, on the other
hand, is completely neutral, i.e. behaves <i>indeterminately</i>.
But that makes the whole situation indeterminate again, and so on.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">We are not finished yet: Cinema and theater inside and
outside, as well as the ways to get there with all the details, are also
circumscribed by the movement of our attention. Instead of letting our thoughts
circle around a cinema, we might as well wander to the subway and the dance
club and forget about the whole theater. Instead, we consciously focus on the
trade-offs between destinations, seats, access routes. That is, the
determinacy/indeterminacy structure applies <i>to
every detail</i> of the trade-off process. And so small decisions are due
everywhere. We cannot escape this decision structure anywhere - it is an
i-structure (infinitesimality structure).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">This
process structure unites determinacy and indeterminacy <i>also</i> <i>totally in every place</i>.
Since both refer to each other and merge into each other towards the center of
the thus circumscribed totality, they are no longer even partially separated
there.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">So where is the respective "point" of
decision? Obviously not in the neutral center between the alternatives, but <i>between center and periphery</i>, in that
very center between determinacy and indeterminacy. Wherever that is. Because
"that" can always only be <i>in-between</i>,
otherwise it would be a side. One can only "limit" it, but never fix
it. In fact, it is distributed throughout the whole process and is only <i>concentrated</i> in central places - <i>altogether</i> in us, but in the direction
of our goals and between them.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Out of this i-structured unity of subunits not only
can, but must, come a free decision. This is the only possibility, the only
meaningful description. It does not matter that to outsiders the choice could
also have been predominantly random or conditional. Coincidences and conditions
such as weather and schedules naturally entered into the decision and limited
its scope in the peripheral area of the process. But the periphery is only one
side of the whole - one of the non-decisive sides.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: start;">
<div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">This text is an excerpt from the book<br />
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:</span><br style="text-align: justify;" /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-consciousness-creates-reality.html" style="text-align: justify;">How Consciousness Creates Reality</a><br style="text-align: justify;" /><br style="text-align: justify;" /><div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-consciousness-creates-reality.html"><img alt="How Consciousness Creates Reality" border="0" data-original-height="252" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicWqC0ajiWb4Jrivz6Tj6Mb_FtYjD7MIhZAl-dDADRDCo8pjJCwWIEHGXZ0qrPS0BHYQHIWvoPPSJecKcDrmMJQUyVZWKwwQehexBsk8Fz_shW2ErguZouqsxsaMnvG4RlAhy-dBr4rNfR/w129-h200/reality-m.jpg" title="How Consciousness Creates Reality" width="129" /></a></div></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2014/01/wie-ist-wahlfreiheit-moeglich.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-62815221859972066462019-01-14T10:13:00.021-08:002023-03-29T11:08:51.373-07:00What is Consciousness? (I)<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Whatever consciousness "is" - it must have
structure. Even emptiness can only be defined in contrast to fullness and
non-duality versus duality (as the word says). Or it is simply "Mu".
And that would be the end of this paper - and everything else.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I suggest that we take some time with this and try to
start from a consciousness that is as concrete as possible, from a conscious
object, say a water glass. We perceive something that we distinguish from
ourselves. We also distinguish it from its environment (table, cupboard, room)
and determine it in comparison with other known things (table, cup, plate) to
what it "is". That is, we <i>circumscribe</i>
its existence by comparison. Likewise, it stabilizes itself through external
and internal interactions (pouring and drinking, molecular attraction and
repulsion).<span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a><o:p></o:p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">We can question these interactions more and more and
never find a bottom. Biological processes, mechanical laws of motion, and
physical fields remain empty without a structure to circumscribe them. That is,
we can regard circumscription as a basic property of everything conscious and
thus of consciousness.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">In every circumscription there now arises something
that has been enormously underestimated up to now: the center point. A single
point that refers directly to the whole. In the case of the water glass, for
example, it is the center of gravity and the optical center, or, if the two are
different, the center circumscribed by them, and so on. For only the whole as
such has a center. Each division creates new centers (those of the splinters),
and each change (like a border with a handle) creates another. Even if the
change is symmetrical (without a handle): Since the center, like any other
point, is <i>nothing in itself</i> and has
meaning only in relation to a certain whole, another whole circumscribes
another center - even at the same "place" (here the center of a
rimmed glass). And already the point next to the center is the center of
something else (a unity of glass and spoon, for example). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Thus there is a unique relationship between the
infinitely small - infinitesimal - center and the circumscribing whole. To
ignore the center is to ignore the whole. In the periphery (edge zone), on the
other hand, the outer boundary is definitive of the whole, thereby emphasizing
its relationship to the center.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">Since
this structure also applies to all partial areas of an object, as well as to
their relations to the whole, in addition <i>between</i>
center and periphery, and between <i>this</i>
center and <i>its</i> periphery, and so on,
I call this totality the <i>infinitesimality structure</i>, or <i>i-structure</i>.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Of course, the relationship between us (the object of
our self-consciousness) and the more external object is also i-structured. And
when we dive into an object, we find only different i-structures there:
trembling "particles", vibrating "fields", circumscribed
"laws".<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">So we have defined nothing less than the surface of
consciousness. What we intuitively perceive as the "unity of the
object" is symbolically <i>condensed</i>
around the center, i.e. we perceive the unity more strongly there because it is
closest to the whole at the center point. (Even in the empty glass: If a little
bit is chipped off, the center hardly changes, and so it is still a glass.)
"Parts" are perceived more as peripheral, where they also
"crumble" more easily. Since consciousness is constantly in
circumscribing motion, condensing more or less static objects, I call it <i>quasi-static</i>.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<div class="c-cms-output">
<div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: justify;">This text is an excerpt from the book</span><br />
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:</span><br style="text-align: justify;" /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-consciousness-creates-reality.html" style="text-align: justify;">How Consciousness Creates Reality</a><br style="text-align: justify;" /><br style="text-align: justify;" /><div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-consciousness-creates-reality.html"><img alt="How Consciousness Creates Reality" border="0" data-original-height="252" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicWqC0ajiWb4Jrivz6Tj6Mb_FtYjD7MIhZAl-dDADRDCo8pjJCwWIEHGXZ0qrPS0BHYQHIWvoPPSJecKcDrmMJQUyVZWKwwQehexBsk8Fz_shW2ErguZouqsxsaMnvG4RlAhy-dBr4rNfR/w129-h200/reality-m.jpg" title="How Consciousness Creates Reality" width="129" /></a></div></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2013/12/bewusstsein-was-ist-das.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-61981017264751188442018-12-31T03:14:00.016-08:002023-03-17T06:39:39.350-07:00Individuality and Reality<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Your individuality is much more than a little
peculiarity. It is a view that nothing and no one has but you. Otherwise
it/he/she would be you. Also, you will have changed your perspective - yourself
- in the next moment, and you cannot turn back time. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">For convenience, we agree on "common"
objects that are supposedly perceived by everyone, although everyone is looking
at things from his or her own point of view. If you see me rolling a pen across
the table to you, you may think it is the same pen that I see. But I see
something <i>completely</i> different from
what you see. There is not the slightest concord between my perception and
yours. Otherwise, I would be sitting in your place, having your thoughts,
memories, and feelings, and connecting them to a shape that is rolling toward
me.<span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a> <o:p></o:p><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">If you and I can speak of a single pen, it is because
we already agreed as children on what we would consider to be <i>approximately</i> a common object, or more
precisely, a pen. We have done the same for ourselves before, changing our own
perspective and noticing the relative permanence of certain shapes. If you now
notice that "someone" is rolling such an approximated object across
the table, you have again briefly changed your point of view, i.e. you have
roughly put yourself into <i>his</i>
perspective and returned to your own. So you can <i>conclude</i> that a common object is rolling, "only" seen
from different sides. In reality, however, you have merged <i>two individual</i> perceptions into a single unit, which emphasizes a
"part" of your own perception (pen) and, in addition, a
"part" of the perception of the other, which you have just
"spied out" (pen). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The unique perspectives thus create, through mutual
exchange, an <i>approximate</i> commonality,
a so-called real pen. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The widespread assumption that a pen is <i>independent</i> of perspectives, on the
other hand, leads into the void if one keeps asking "what it is made
of": of molecules, these of atoms, these of elementary particles, these of
fields, and these of laws of change. But change <i>of what</i>? It is an endless loop. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">However, <i>no</i>
concept has yet been able to explain why a rolling pencil can be quite stable:
It does not break or change direction when I just think about it. I have to
touch it. And then it changes immediately for both of us (provided we are both
looking "there"). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">In the Perspective Exchange Concept, therefore, we
must assume that largely unknown (unconscious) processes stabilize our
perception. Their effect must be in accordance with proven physical
regularities. Both conclusions are consistent. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The concept of an independent reality, on the other
hand, is a crutch that is used to <i>project</i>
stability into objects that are not really understood, thus largely <i>hiding</i> individual perceptions within
them. This is not consistent. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal">I am not questioning macro- and microphysics. They
describe what they are looking for, mainly processes of "common"
objects. But one must also say: If physics is not fundamental, but everything
remains <i>basically</i> individual, it must
still be explained in other ways, and physics does not become superfluous, but
subordinate. Psychological connections will play an important role, but even
they are not fundamental enough. Rather, the most abstract and simplest
structures of <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2019/01/what-is-consciousness-1.html">consciousness</a> are to be considered first.<span style="font-family: inherit;"> <br /><br /></span></div></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><br /></span>
<div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">This text is an excerpt from the book<br />
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div style="text-align: start;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: start;"><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2012/05/individualitat-und-realitat.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-434938702783273412011-01-22T05:08:00.000-08:002024-02-17T04:42:57.476-08:00Division by Zero - a playful short discussion<p> <span lang="EN-US" style="text-align: justify;"><span>James Anderson<span>*</span></span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="text-align: justify;"> has proposed an obvious definition for the dreaded division by zero...</span></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align: justify;">To ensure consistent formatting, the document is in PDF: <a href="https://free-will.de/division_en.pdf">Division by Zero</a></p><a name='more'></a><p class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align: justify;">German original: <a href="https://bewusstsein-und-realitaet.de/division.pdf">Division durch Null</a></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">One application (click to enlarge):</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifhDEuwLmcQwjYJnmztRQUmP_UpGrHUmKcLn7VJKclKNLG1OPkosmnFJOKxjr4-B7eN21zXziqm1vIKYkZ8UnpH8wiYKaIJsNUQu6MozsUtVSc6lD1sYqOS5O9YDHnwzt2F2AA_1FHO1qxC6gi2-vceD7xSJPip5q1tDt87wP1J8wiOi4aaEP0MHZwaNx3/s2108/awareness-reco.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2108" data-original-width="1883" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifhDEuwLmcQwjYJnmztRQUmP_UpGrHUmKcLn7VJKclKNLG1OPkosmnFJOKxjr4-B7eN21zXziqm1vIKYkZ8UnpH8wiYKaIJsNUQu6MozsUtVSc6lD1sYqOS5O9YDHnwzt2F2AA_1FHO1qxC6gi2-vceD7xSJPip5q1tDt87wP1J8wiOi4aaEP0MHZwaNx3/w358-h400/awareness-reco.jpg" width="358" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:<br /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></p><div class="c-cms-output"><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div><br /><br /><div><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><p align="right" class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align: right;"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p><div style="mso-element: footnote-list;"><hr align="left" size="1" width="33%" /><!--[endif]--></div><div id="ftn1" style="mso-element: footnote;"><p class="MsoFootnoteText"><span>*</span> <a href="http://www.bookofparagon.com/News/News_00012.htm">www.bookofparagon.com/News/News_00012.htm</a></p></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-50586648580490416262010-10-19T06:21:00.094-07:002023-03-26T06:15:58.016-07:00Radical constructivism - a hollow shell?<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Radical constructivists do not speak of creating reality, but of
constructing reality. What is the difference? <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">"Creating reality" ultimately means creating <i>everything</i>, without exception. "Constructing reality"
means interpreting external "disturbances" and thus shaping effects. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Thus the constructivist has the lesser claim, but at the price of
inconsistency. He cannot avoid including an external cause of effect that essentially
determines his construction. In principle, however, he cannot and does not want
to know by what this obviously pre-structured effect is exerted. What is
important is only what is useful in the context of one's own life, whereby
"usefulness" is equally constructed and thus co-determined by this
external something, and so on.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Instead, he might well admit that there is an external reality, the effect
of which he is only further constructing. But he would not be saying anything
essentially new. And once he admits its pre-structuring, he might as well go on
to ask what else there is to "pre-recognize". And with that, he
abolishes the radicality of constructivism.<span></span></span></p><a name='more'></a><o:p></o:p><p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">On the other hand, can there be a complete creation of reality <i>by us</i>? Yes, if you redefine what is
meant by "us". If I say, "I create reality," and by
"I" I mean my waking, conscious ego, this is an enormous abridgement.
The ego perceives, chooses and gives impulses. These are its <i>contributions</i>. But with the creation of
heaven and earth at the latest, it would be hopelessly overtaxed. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">The amazing thing about the I is that on the one hand it has no final limit
<i>anywhere</i>, and on the other hand it is
unique. And moreover, that this is true for every place of effect. Because it
means that there is a priority hierarchy of effects that extends into all the
other individuals - those extended I's and places - without merging with them.
So I - as an infinite individual - create my reality completely, including
heaven and earth. More or less consciously. What remains after the death of my
awake conscious ego are the realities of other individuals. And after humanity,
there are all the other realities.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">But are the worlds of other individuals real to me? Yes, insofar as I can
put myself into them, return back, and remember that <i>potential</i>. And insofar as all unlimited individuals attune out of
these movements an approximate reality that is less alien (but still
individual) to them. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Ultimately, we are dealing with an explorable dynamic reality behind the
apparent effects, and an individual reality constantly re-condensing out of a
high-frequency alternation of individuals. I contribute to the reality <i>of others</i> only as an aspect of this
exchange, but the constructivist "hollow shell" is dynamically
filled.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Is there even a "being" that exists independently of me and any
consciousness?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">No. The boundary between perception and "being" is already
bridged by the fact that in order to imagine a "being" we have to
"enter" it a little. Even if we do not want to imagine a being, but
are forced to define a limit of the perceptible, we have already crossed it in
principle. So the relativity of this limit is nothing new. If we now examine
what is at stake in these crossings and limits, we find the fundamental dynamic
of the point of observation (ultimately of the individual). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US">Therefore, the alternation of perception is the fundamental thing, and its
relative constancy requires justification - just like our habit of conveniently
holding artificially detached "things" to be equally valid for all.
We then call them "real". But upon closer examination, this reality
is an individually and collectively created one, which appears more or less
stable depending on the depth of consciousness of the dynamic construction. And
since there is no ultimate limit, there is no limit to this depth, either. What
needs to be explained instead is the limitation of our self-consciousness.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></p><div class="c-cms-output"><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="MsoNormal"><span>Recommended book:</span><br /><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div><div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div></div></div><br /><br /></div></div><div><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="https://bewusstsein-janew.blogspot.com/2010/09/radikaler-konstruktivismus-ein.html"><b>Original version in German here</b></a></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-38028753412596467622010-09-21T04:37:00.005-07:002022-07-23T22:52:27.689-07:00Laws of Form: Why Spencer-Brown is missing the point<div style="text-align: justify;">
In his famous book <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_Form" rel="" target="_blank"><i>Laws of Form</i></a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Spencer-Brown" rel="" target="_blank">George Spencer-Brown</a>
tries to construct
the world from the most simple. He begins with a simple distinction, a
circle on a structureless plane for example. He does not say that this
is the only way to begin, but makes the reader simply do
it and see what is developing. In addition, he gives more handling
instructions, which reduces the most possible to the least possible.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I focus on his beginnings – the distinction – and the way how this is
interpreted by him (indeed): ”… every duality implies triplicity: what
the thing is, what it isn’t, and the boundary between
them.” By this the world is digitalized. Subsequently, he examines
extensions (“… to recross [the boundary] is not to cross [the
boundary]”) and reductions (“What a thing is and what it is not are
identical in form”). In any case, the boundary remains only boundary,
i.e. distinction.<br />
<a name='more'></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, the boundary has been created just by crossing itself: It
only exists by changing the sides. If I stand still on one side, <i>all</i> vanishes.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But when I change the side, I must change to <i>another</i>. Therefore, both sides are <i>never</i> identical in distinction, because then the crossing, the alternation, that creates them, would
vanish.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If we reduce everything to distinction (“form”) as such, as Spencer-Brown sometimes does, the distinction still must be perceived as such.
This means, the alternation <i>condenses</i>. And this it
does (without changing everything) only in the middle. So the boundary is <i>unity</i> in extreme, <i>moment of identity</i> of both sides. The alternation then takes place between the center of
identity and periphery, which leads to <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" rel="" target="">infinitesimality structure</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
What Spencer-Brown wants to rationalize out of existence, therefore,
is alternation itself – the prerequisite of his whole operation! By that
he simplifies (identifies) more than he says. And he
does not say all that is important.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If one <i>follows</i> his instructions, no contradiction results. But who says, that one has to <i>restrict</i> oneself in this manner?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As for the extension “to recross is not to cross”: It shows that
identity always points beyond itself, since strictly speaking it came
into being by recrossing – there is no closed operation, the
unlimited world is connected. With this even the extension of the
Brownian principles is justified.<br /><br />
<div class="c-cms-output" style="text-align: start;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:</span><br />
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: start;">
<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-3155848700463202212010-03-05T03:50:00.004-08:002022-07-23T22:52:46.320-07:00Individuality and the physical paradigm<span style="text-align: justify;">The physical paradigm contains serious distortions or inconsistencies:</span><br />
<div class="c-cms-output">
<ol>
<li style="text-align: justify;">The Brain is seen as the ultimate "perceiver". But who perceives the
brain? The brain again? This is a circle, where my concept of
circumscription comes in.</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Reality is seen as physical after all, and by "physical" our
paradigm is meant. From this a limited view of information derives.
Here, my infinitesimality structure suggests a deeper view from
which "information" derives.</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">"Physical" also means "objective", and objectivity is considered to
be "not part of the observer" (the term "observer" contains this
misunderstanding in itself). So where in this world is the
observer? Observed by whom? Or not observed at all?<a name='more'></a></li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Infinitesimality structure</a> means, that there is no object in itself.
Objects only condense from universal change by circumscription. This
change is an alternation between individuals, and these
individuals are condensations of this change, too. So neither firm
objects nor objective individuals exist. There is only change or
alternation in itself (structure of alternation).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Quantum physics describes another form of alternation than classical
physics. There seems to be a basic unity, an elementary quantum. To
perceive (or think) such a quantum, however, needs
circumscription of "it", condensation of a movement. Again, there is no
quantum in itself, although we treat it as such – and limit our focus on
it.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
How then can it be circumscribed so stable? This is the question to
be asked, while not simplifying it to an object in itself (except for
practical use).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In this concept there is no exclusive observer, there are only
individual views (= individuals). Every view is unlimited at the end
(and so are the individuals), but is limited asymptotically by
self-reflection aimed at a controllable world and at building structures
at all. (A continuous plenum reflects on limited structure to define
itself.)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
To view the world infinitesimality-structured means to think beyond
elementary quantum and quantum information, because "information" is
already a condensation, a permanent attuning of alternating
individuals (individual views). No information is transmitted: An
attunement takes place – by condensating a change, changing position,
and decondensating individually. The whole process is
precondensated before of course by developing a "common" language,
establishing a "common" infrastructure etc., and by unknown processes,
too.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Alternation is unlimited, because logically there cannot be a limit
without the possibility to cross it in principle. I know that logic is
thought by humans, but on the other hand thinking is seen
as an appropriate tool to relate to the bigger world. It must be so,
otherwise we would not (self-) exist in it. Although our thinking may be
inconsistent, it cannot be meaningless to the bigger
extent. Although the "ultimate" observer does not exist, individual
standpoints do exist; and so does their attunement.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Infinitesimality and infinity are consequences of limitlessness with
respect to the existent meaning of the individual thinking. They can be
well a camouflage for unperceived structures, but they
always point beyond the perceived ones and they always remain essential
values to deal with.<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="text-align: justify;">Recommended book:</span><br />
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html">Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternating-consciousness.html" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="163" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrQ_jh-T8GxFzPPTaMd5APFWs8NOpUEDbgCRQ7O2k4g37uTocLqYXY8I3owArPNfjivZAaUl1mDtjcH43tzc0Ib0zPbB32olCJFy515KRfbwvZ_M6M1bBK-BTyh8M9bwx9ztD0aMnwoZN1/w128-h200/AC-Cover_m.png" title="Alternating Consciousness. From Perception to Infinities and Back to Free Will" width="128" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6607756413170900693.post-30286279469355744432007-04-15T04:51:00.001-07:002023-01-21T02:34:45.891-08:00Reality and creation in a nutshell (dynamic existence)<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Everything is in motion. "Inertness" arises from (approximative)
repetition, that is, through rotation or an alternation that delineates a
focus of consciousness.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This focus of consciousness, in turn, must also move/alternate (the
two differ only in continuity). If its alternation seems to go too far -
physically, psychically or intellectually - it reaches
into the subconscious.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In this way, interconnection is established by the alternation of the
focus of consciousness. Therefore, in a world in which everything is
interconnected, all focuses must reciprocally transition
into each other.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
"Reality" is a common "goal", a focus which all participants can
switch into and which is conscious to them as such, as a potential one.
Its "degree of reality" is the probability of its fully
becoming conscious (or more simply: its current degree of
consciousness).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Thus, a reality is created when all participants increase its probability or, respectively, their consciousness of it.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<ul style="text-align: -webkit-center;">
<li><div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
Perception of dynamic existence is awareness.</div>
</li>
<li><div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
Awareness is <a href="https://consciousness-janew.blogspot.com/2012/04/definition-of-infinitesimality.html">infinitesimality-structured</a>.</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width: 0pt;" title="Creative Commons License" /></a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com